The Gutenberg John Man
book reviews: · · · · · ·

· · ·
|

|
The Gutenberg: How One Man Remade the World with Words
John Man
Wiley, John & Sons
Hardcover
320 pages
March 2002

|
|
 
Without John Man, history would be a duller place. He is a historian, and an
excellent one, with a background in German studies and the history of
science. But thicketed in the groves of academe he is not. He is fascinated
with Mongolia, certainly off the beaten track for the historian after
academic renown. His book Gobi: Tracking the Desert elegantly presaged
today’s Silk Road kerfuffle by many years. This was in itself no mean feat
because it is not easy to be elegant and witty when writing about steppes,
Mongols, and deserts. He then blossomed in the garden of topical historians
who chronicle a phenomenon rather than traditional events. His The Atlas of
the Year 1000 (actually a bit more: ACE 950 to 1050) garnered critical accolades for putting a complex era into imagistic settings readily
understood by readers who can’t stand footnotes and bibliographies. Next came
Alpha Beta, in which he puffed the imaginations of readers criss-across the
Etruscan and Phoenician lake, turning them into modern Odysseans after the
fleece of ciphers. Merchants managed rather nicely long before Club Med.
Gutenberg enjoys the paternity of both those books, combining the best of era
painting with the liquor of the word when uncorked from the chisel and quill:
“For 300 years now, the production of books had brought Christians ever
further and ever faster out of the age of darkness that had descended on
Europe after the fall of Rome. The flame of learning, tended for a thousand
years in a thousand monasteries, burned brighter by the year. Religious books
were easier to read, with capital letters marked with colour, and chapter
divisions. No longer did monks mutter out loud as they read, as if reading
was a form of talk; people actually read to themselves, in silence. As trade
links grew and towns evolved, learning escaped from the cloister, and
ordinary people began to send their children to school, to learn the three Rs
as well as Latin, the language of religion and thus of learning. Universities
arose from about 1350, with a consequent demand for books. As paper made from
rags became more popular, so books became cheaper. Merchants' offices and
city halls had their scribes, and the scribes acquired assistants, and all
needed an education, and the teachers needed books, and so literacy
spiralled, feeding itself One Italian entrepreneur, Francesco di Marco Datini
of Prato, left 140,000 letters when he died in 1410. People, particularly
Italians living in a score of trade-rich city-states, already knew they were
in the midst of an intellectual and artistic fermentation; the Renaissance
was one of those few historical periods that discovered itself, rather than
being defined by hindsight.”
Thus in 239 words Mr. Man takes us from Rome to the Renaissance and from
mutters to majesty. Much of his book has this mix of dustcloth and
microscope. He does stop short of tourism writing, perhaps to a fault: the
ragpickers he mentions in passing still survive in out-of-the-way Italian and
Greek villages, hollering their connect-the-hollers routes through the
labyrinths of towns little touched by technology.
One of the most delicate tasks when writing about history is to remain
rigorous as to the facts while transporting the reader into scenes that feel
like they are happening right now, just outside the door, the two-team
oxcarts as real as today’s FedEx trucks. In his choice of telling detail Mr.
Man is a miniaturist as delightful as any Netherlandish court painter. After
quoting a modern Dutch typographer’s description of working with chisels on
steel, Mr. Man goes above and beyond the call of historian duty:
“This is truly artistry in miniature, a Western version of those Chinese
geniuses who wrote on grains of rice. A curl of steel cut in this way is no
more than 0.01 millimetres thick, which is the width of a dot on a dot-matrix
printer with a resolution of 6.25 million dots per square inch. By
comparison, an early dot-matrix had 90,000–120,000 dpi (dots per square
inch). Today's laser printers have a resolution of 750,000 dpi (measured in
grains of toner rather than old-fashioned dots, but the terminology endures).
Now remember that these minute slivers of steel were no more than 0.01
millimetres thick; they could be as little as a tenth of that, just one
micron thick (a thousandth of a millimetre, or a twenty-five-thousandth of an
inch).
“The startling conclusion is that Johann Gutenberg, from his childhood, was
in the company of men who could carve a letter in steel that had at least
six, and perhaps sixty, times the resolution of a modern laser printer....”
With writing like this, you don’t exactly have to step across the cart
furrows on your way to check on the goings-on in Weledelherr Gutenberg’s shop
across the way, but Mainz and Strasbourg under the deft daub of his pen are
the next best thing. Mr. Man mixes the mirror and the macroscope to such
adroit facility that Gutenberg the man and Gutenberg the phenomenon come
alive as one.
As his compatriots have before him, Mr. Man had relatively little hard fact
to work with. For all that Gutenberg did for the profusion of the word, he
left precious few of his own behind. Little is known about him until the
1440s, by which time he was somewhere in his 40s. He already was renowned for
merging the techniques of the coinage trade with the casting of convex
mirrorlike buttons, producing thereby countless medallions then in great
demand by the trinket trade along pilgrimage routes. One of grander versions
of these mirrors is depicted in Jan Van Eyck’s “Marriage of Giovanni
Arnolfini.” Think of Gutenberg as having devised the latest thing in 15th
century Sai Baba buttons. Frippery perhaps this was, but it led to the
development of modern type casting, the key element in the evolution of
moveable type.
Neither Gutenberg nor even the Western devotion to practical technique were
the first at this. At the other end of the Silk Road, as far on it one could
get without walking into the sea, a genius surpassing even Gutenberg, Sejong
by name, devised both moveable type *and* a written alphabet where “even the
sound of the winds, the cry of the crane and the barking of the dog—all may
be written.” Lucky Sejong was blessed not merely with intellect and
inventiveness, but also the title “Emperor” before his name. This gave him
no end of advantage over the average type founder and alphabet inventor. Nor
was he the first: the 28-letter Hangul (“Great Script”) he devised was based
in part on a script devised by a Tibetan monk named Phangs-pa as a way of
systematizing the many tongues of the Mongol Empire. Alas, though Sejong’s
efforts resulted in a library of over 160 works printed with moveable type
based on Hangul, it did not create an information revolution of the sort
inspired by his contemporary colleague in far-off Mainz. Why? Because the
Korean elite insisted on sticking with Chinese, in great part because they
wanted to preserve their status. Mr. Man’s brief outline of events in Korea
hint of a great tale to be told by a novelist—or Mr. Man himself—with a gift
for creating in the mind’s eye what the actual eye of the time would have
seen. To say nothing of what the nose smelled and the tongue tasted. The
sensuality of history is its least-examined feature.
Korea’s triumph of elitism wasn’t replicated in the West. The Catholic
clergy stuck to Latin, in large part to keep the masses from finding out what
they knew and said among themselves. But unlike Korea, the elitism of the
Church was underlain by moral and economic corruption so blatant we can
scarce imagine it today. Some say that once the words of the Bible became
known to anyone who cared to read them, Luther or someone like him was
inevitable. Maybe. What was inevitable, though, was the Enlightenment. Nearly
everyone today nourishes from the fruits of that tree. Within fifty years of
Gutenberg’s first Bible circa 1450, the number of books of all kinds in
Europe grew from thousands to millions. Science, literature, and the factual
approach to history emerged. Church hegemony collapsed. Kings created
nation-states. Proof, not faith, became the criterion of truth. As Mr. Man
points put, the book, and no less the man behind it, was the vehicle out of
the Dark Ages.
It becomes very clear on a second reading of his book, cover to cover and
this time looking at the air and light in the room as well as the
furnishings, that Mr. Man is no less a scholar to the teeth than the myriads
of Ph.D pensters who have made the Middle Ages and Renaissance such a huge
section in the Dewey Decimal catalogs. The difference is that Mr. Man can
write rings around most historians. Pages 60 and 61 are such a recital of the
fakery of the relics and pilgrimage trade that you might take it as satire
until you reflect on how many Westerners today pilgrimage to Indian ashrams
to lap up equally fanciful interpretations of Hindu legends, without much
bothering to put into practice in their daily lives the moral and behavioral
principles those gods commend.
Maypoles and meanders around the trees of history. If you don’t have a love
affair going with today’s forest of words before Mr. Man, you certainly will
after him.
© 2002 by Dana De Zoysa for Curled Up With a Good Book
|
|